Hypothesis: What if Buddha Invested?

Posted on November 30, 2006
Filed Under Business pleasure |

Iâ€™ve seen many articles, even books written about the topic â€œWhat if Buddha Dated?â€, so I decided to write one called â€œWhat if Buddha Invested?â€ Given the non-attachment to materialism that Buddhism preaches, it may be strange to think that Buddhist principles can lead to better principles of wealth building, but selflessness and a detachment from the emotional aspect of building wealth, particularly the emotion of greed, can markedly improve oneâ€™s ability to build wealth.

If Buddha Was a Stock Picker

Approaching relationships with a Buddhist mentality, one would not enter a relationship by assigning false hopes or characteristics of glowing positivity to a potential partner that one was just getting to know. Furthermore, one would not become excessively attached to your partner, feeling a compulsive need to call or text message him or her every single hour of the waking day. If Buddha invested, he would also apply these same principles to choosing stocks. He would not assign numerous positive qualities to a stock from a single glowing TV report or newspaper article without truly digging deep to confirm that such a positive view was well justified. Furthermore, Buddha would never become enamored with a stock and hold on to a stock if it lost 25% of its value, convinced that it would come back. Instead Buddha, due to his credo of non-attachment to material things, would set the stock free and let it go once it had reached a certain stop-loss limit.

If Buddha Searched for a Financial Consultant

The Dalai Lama says, “If you want to be wisely selfish, care for others.” In martial arts, my first instructor, Sensei Dukes, told me that he could teach me to lose all fear, even fear of dying. He told me that all fear was rooted in ego, and that if you learn to let go of ego, all fear disappears. In relationships, all jealousy originates from ego. On the other hand, happiness originates out of selflessness. If Buddha were to invest and turn his money over to a financial consultant, Buddha no doubt would eliminate all persons that he even suspected of suffering from the vice of greed. If Buddha suspected that a consultant would fully invest all of his money when dollar cost averaging into the market would make more sense due to uncertain market conditions, Buddha would eliminate this person from consideration.

If Buddha heard a financial consultant brag about himself or herself as the best, the smartest, the one that manages the most money in his or her office, he would eliminate this person from consideration as well, realizing that such an extreme ego would lead to selfish decisions that were not in his best interest. If Buddha believed that the financial consultant was not selfless, but instead a â€œcompanyâ€ man or woman that would tow the company line to satisfy his or her boss rather than make the best possible decision for his investments, Buddha would also eliminate this person from consideration.

In fact, Buddha would probably ask the financial consultant is he or she was invested in the exact same assets that he or she was recommending for him. If the answer was no, Buddha would be skeptical. If the answer was yes, Buddha wouldnâ€™t necessarily be convinced that he had found a winner, but it would be a start.

If Buddha Ran an Investment Firm

But letâ€™s return to the concept of â€œnon-attachmentâ€ for a second. Non-attachment in communication manifests itself in honesty. During conflict resolution, an adherence to non attachment manifests itself in the deliverance of â€œIâ€ statements rather than accusatory statements. Two of the main selling strategies of investment firms is utilizing the powerful emotions of fear and greed.

Fear is utilized by selling people on the fact that diversification is the best risk-reward setup for you the client. In reality, diversification is the lowest common denominator strategy that allows all firm consultants to allocate your money in the least amount of time to produce mediocre returns just good enough so you wonâ€™t leave but yet free up the most time for consultants to gather more assets for the firm.

Firms further utilize fear when “selling” clients on the necessity of diversification by leading clients to believe that more highly concentrated positions in fewer asset classes or fewer countries exposes clients to higher risk and thus higher possibilities of losses. Again, this is not true. More highly concentrated positions in fewer asset classes and fewer asset classes will lead to much greater returns if performed thoughtfully and with insight. However, this process requires time, and time is a commodity that acts as the enemy when the goal is to maximize the amount of assets gathered and thus, the amount of fees that can be charged. What reduces the amount of time needed to allocate your portfolio, but also returns? The theory of diversification. If Buddha ran an investment firm, he would never use the fear-driven Modern Portfolio Theory of diversification to manage a single clientâ€™s assets.

Greed is utilized by convincing clients to place their money in higher risk but higher-commission or higher-fee products with the hope of quick, easy returns. If Buddha ran an investment firm, he would invest in the exact same assets that he would purchase for his clients.

If Buddha Wanted to Build Wealth

If Buddha dated, Buddha would probably not subscribe to the Jerry Maguire mantra of â€œyou complete meâ€. Instead, just as every martial artist knows that only he or she can defeat him or herself, Buddha would probably work on improving himself first, knowing that such self-improvement would attract the perfect partner and save him many hours or years of searching. Likewise, if Buddha was an investor, he would no doubt desire to learn to invest himself instead of just handing his hard-earned millions over to a financial consultant, the overwhelming majority that have their selfish interests at heart versus the interests of the investor.

Buddha the investor would realize that there is no easy-way to build wealth, and that the easy path to investing, i.e. handing your money over to someone else, is often the path that will cause the most mistakes and grief. After all, if that average financial consultant has at a minimum, 100 clients, how many hours of personalized attention can your portfolio possibly receive? Buddha would realize that with a million dollar account, if managing his own account would yield $150,000 more a year than handing it to someone else, and that the effort required to do so would be one hour per day, or 260 hours a year, that this time commitment would be tiny on the effort-reward scale. Unless Buddhaâ€™s job paid him more than $576 an hour, the effort required for self-improvement in the investment knowledge arena would most definitely be worth the returns and rewards.

This article may be freely reprinted on another website as long as it is not modified, changed, or altered in any way and as long as the below author byline is included along with the active hyperlink exactly as is.

J.S. Kim is the Managing Director of SmartKnowledgeUâ„¢. He has over thirteen years of experience in finance and financial services, and has earned a BA in Neurobiology from the University of Pennsylvania, a Master in Public Affairs from the University of Texas at Austin, and an MBA with a concentration in finance from the McCombs Business School, University of Texas at Austin. He is the inventor of the revolutionary MoneyPingâ„¢ investment strategies, a novel approach to learn how to build wealth, not just dreams.

To learn more at J.S. Kim’s blog “The Zen of Investing”, click the following link, Learn to Invest Money and Achieve Financial Freedom